Comments on: Landmark Decision Made In CA Forestry Case http://www.sosforests.com/?p=719 Protecting, maintaining, and perpetuating America's priceless, heritage forests Mon, 06 Sep 2010 08:14:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1 By: Mike http://www.sosforests.com/?p=719#comment-37983 Mike Sun, 04 Nov 2007 19:51:22 +0000 http://www.sosforests.com/?p=719#comment-37983 You're on, Doctor Mister. I say the Ninth Cross-circuit rejects the eco-wacko appeal with the back of their bony hands. And that will be dickety bucks you owe me. You’re on, Doctor Mister. I say the Ninth Cross-circuit rejects the eco-wacko appeal with the back of their bony hands. And that will be dickety bucks you owe me.

]]> By: Forrest Grump http://www.sosforests.com/?p=719#comment-37965 Forrest Grump Sun, 04 Nov 2007 18:45:16 +0000 http://www.sosforests.com/?p=719#comment-37965 Twenny bucks, but only if the case is actually kicked upstairs. If it stays (as the strategist dorks might decide because losing would apply to the whole Circus) then I win. Depends on who is impaneled as well. [<em>That is call hedging one's bet and not allowed - M</em>] I'm thinking that the balance of harms language in HFRA matters in this case, because the QLG projects and the work on Lake Arrowhead and San Berdo NF are apparently HFRA-driven projects, inasmuch as Di-Fi helped drive HFRA plus she has been a long-term QLG backer. So if this baybee goes to the Ninth, and the appeal goes down, it'll be worth twenny bucks. Twenny bucks, but only if the case is actually kicked upstairs. If it stays (as the strategist dorks might decide because losing would apply to the whole Circus) then I win. Depends on who is impaneled as well. [That is call hedging one’s bet and not allowed - M]

I’m thinking that the balance of harms language in HFRA matters in this case, because the QLG projects and the work on Lake Arrowhead and San Berdo NF are apparently HFRA-driven projects, inasmuch as Di-Fi helped drive HFRA plus she has been a long-term QLG backer.

So if this baybee goes to the Ninth, and the appeal goes down, it’ll be worth twenny bucks.

]]> By: Mike http://www.sosforests.com/?p=719#comment-37866 Mike Sun, 04 Nov 2007 06:13:29 +0000 http://www.sosforests.com/?p=719#comment-37866 I'll take that bet. England refused to enjoin the Meadow Valley Project in a similar opinion in 2005 that the Ninth Circus did not overturn. See: http://www.qlg.org/pub/miscdoc/mvsuit/mvsuit.htm I’ll take that bet. England refused to enjoin the Meadow Valley Project in a similar opinion in 2005 that the Ninth Circus did not overturn. See:

http://www.qlg.org/pub/miscdoc/mvsuit/mvsuit.htm

]]> By: Forrest Grump http://www.sosforests.com/?p=719#comment-37861 Forrest Grump Sun, 04 Nov 2007 04:53:37 +0000 http://www.sosforests.com/?p=719#comment-37861 Wow! Vegetation management works? Perish the thought. On Judge England: Bush appointee, USAR officer, Missouri native. State Superior Court judge in Sacto, put in that slot by Pete Wilson. Last judge confirmed on voice vote before Senate recess. Coached U football to pay for law school. The fun part here is going to be when the Ninth Circus decides to stomp this down. Bet on it. Wow! Vegetation management works? Perish the thought.

On Judge England: Bush appointee, USAR officer, Missouri native. State Superior Court judge in Sacto, put in that slot by Pete Wilson. Last judge confirmed on voice vote before Senate recess. Coached U football to pay for law school.

The fun part here is going to be when the Ninth Circus decides to stomp this down. Bet on it.

]]>